Case Study
How Gateshead Residents Helped Shape the Council’s Energy Strategy
Gateshead Residents Forum
- Location: Gateshead (High Fell, Windy Nook and Whitehills)
- Size: 20 residents
- Challenge: Gateshead aims to lead in the energy transition. With a District Heat Network already in place for some commercial and social housing areas, the challenge was ensuring residents had a genuine say in how the next stages of the energy transition should unfold – so that changes reflect their priorities, values, and everyday realities.
- Recruitment : 4,000 randomly selected households received invitation letters. From there, 23 residents were chosen to broadly reflect the community across demographics like age, gender, ethnicity, housing tenure, disability and climate attitudes. 20 residents consistently attended all sessions.
- Days of dialogue: 21 hours over four in-person sessions (two full days and two evening sessions)
Executive Summary
- What kind of energy system do we want?
- How should any changes be made to work for residents?
Objectives
The aims of the project were to:
- Ensure residents shape the future energy system in their wards
- Reflect what residents value about their communities in energy decisions
- Integrate community-generated vision and recommendations into Gateshead Council’s wider Energy Strategy
Approach and Methodology
Participants took part in a Citizen Visioning process. They explored how energy systems could evolve in a way that aligned with their values and local contexts. Across four in-person sessions, participants reflected on what they valued about their place, learning about energy systems, climate change and district heating, deve;oped and refined a long list of ideas, and produced a collective vision statement and set of priority recommendations. Council staff and climate experts were on hand throughout to answer questions and provide input on feasibility. All sessions were supported by independent facilitators.
Inclusive Practice
Participants received £315 gift of thanks for participating in all sessions. Expenses such as travel and childcare were provided to remove financial barriers. Live translation was offered to participants (see challenges section). Sessions were designed to be inclusive, welcoming and cater to the needs of the 20 participants.
Innovations.
Key Outcomes
- 20 residents who reflected the diversity of the local population attended all four sessions
Climate Impact
- The council has already started acting on the recommendations, including crreating a ‘Green Room’ – a resource hub to support residents in making energy-saving improvements to their homes
Social Impact
- Participants left the process more confident and informed about the council’s local energy plans
- Participants felt their voices were being taken seriously
- ‘While the process format is guided, the contents are entirely the work of community members. I have a fundamental distrust of government, but this appears to be a genuine effort by Gateshead Council to gauge what residents and ordinary people want. This is a really important step in making truly democratic decisions that are by the people and for the people’.
Internal Impact
- The process generated enthusiasm within the council, with increased interest in the energy transition from the local ward teams and other council members
- The council has committed to publishing a formal response to every resident recommendation including setting out reasons and alternative where a recommendation cannot be implemented, sharing progress updates with the participants, and publishing the final report on their website.
Challenges and Lessons Learned
Challenges
- Scope tension as the residents wanted a broad discussion about their place and the council wanted specific feedback on the Heat Network
- Resource strain as the council teams were incredibly stretched. Staff time and availability was a challenge and will continue to impact the uptake of recommendations as resources are further constrained.
- Translation challenges as one participant required live translation which was hard to manage effectively in whole group conversations
In-Project Solutions
- We adapted the process so it began more broadly with discussions about place and narrowed down into energy-specific recommendations
- We held briefings, an internal impact session, and encouraged participation from key council staff to help build buy-in across departments
- Working with the same translator each session helped build trust and smoother ways of working to enable the participant to contribute more effectively
Communicating for impact
We are communicating about the process and its impact in a number of ways including: a short film that captures the process and participant interviews, a report detailing the recommendations and council’s response, direct progress updates with the participants to ensure accountability and continued trust. We are also considering how to launch the outcomes alongside new District Heat Network developments to link up work across the council.
Key Takeaways & Recommendations
Start where people are. Being with residents’ values and experiences then connect to net zero goals. It makes climate action feel relevant and empowering
Secure council-wide buy-in. Engage staff from across departments and hold internal briefings early. Don’t rely on one point of contact – shared ownership is vital
Plan for impact. Hold ‘impact meetings’ before and after the engagement to really focus on the impact of the engagement and how resident ideas can be translated into action across departments
Engage wider actors. Involving non-council partners increases the changes that recommendations can be taken forward
Ensure your engagement is accessible. The gift of thanks and upfront support with travel or childcare enabled residents who don’t normally engage in climate issues to attend and contribute.